Legal Case for Breakfast

I haven't had breakfast yet and it seems that I'm going to have a metaphorical one ahead of the physical. I'm probably being obsessive-compulsive about my blogs, but I can't stand the look of an obviously incomplete piece. It ruins the look of the site.

Anyway, while reflecting on what I've done so far. I had an idea for producing content in my subject-specific blogs. While the case digests are now easier to read compared to the full text of the cases, I'm still uncomfortable going to the exams without a clear sense of the answers that I'm prepared to give to the questions I'm aware will be given. So, after digesting cases, I'll gather up the issues and place them in my subject-specific blogs.

The issues in the ObliCon cases will go to Cannot Argue Breach of Contract. For criminal law cases, I'll use Cannot Argue Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Issues in legal ethics will go to Cannot Argue Disbarment Cases. I still have to revise my blogs for political or constitutional law, but I'm thinking Cannot Defend Civil Liberties sounds good for Constitutional Law II. Anyway, I can't find the sub-domain from my list. So, ato de. Later. Ikanakereba-naranai desû. I have to go. Bangohan o tabemasû. I'll eat breakfast.